mouse gdna samples Search Results


96
Zymo Research genomic dna clean concentrator kit
Genomic Dna Clean Concentrator Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/Genomic+DNA+Clean+%26+Concentrator-10/pm35586252-70-8-14
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genomic dna clean concentrator kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
tiangen biotech co fecal genomic dna extraction kit
Fecal Genomic Dna Extraction Kit, supplied by tiangen biotech co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/Genomic+DNA+Kit/pm40490795-104-14-19
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fecal genomic dna extraction kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher genejet genomic dna purification kit
Genejet Genomic Dna Purification Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/DNA/pm39574201-54-34-39
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genejet genomic dna purification kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Thermo Fisher dnazol reagent genomic dna isolation kit
Dnazol Reagent Genomic Dna Isolation Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/DNAzol+Reagent/pm41411656-47-11-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dnazol reagent genomic dna isolation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Toyobo revertra acetm qpcr rt master mix
Fig. 1. Bmal1 deficiency does not affect differentiation and morphology of BMMCs. (A) Representative dot-plot data (Left) and percentage of c-kit+FcεRIα+ cells (Right, n¼6) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks detected by flowcytometric analysis. (B) Flowcytometric analysis of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of c-kit (Left) or FceR1a levels (Right) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks (n = 6). (C-E) Representative pictures of toluidine blue (C), Diff-Quik (D) or esterase (E) staining of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence of 2- ME after 6–8 weeks. (F) Expression of mast cell differentiation marker and functional genes, determined by <t>qPCR</t> in WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME for 6–8 weeks (n = 3). Mean ± SD is shown. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, *P < 0.05. ns: non-specific difference. (For inter pretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Revertra Acetm Qpcr Rt Master Mix, supplied by Toyobo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/ReverTra+Ace+qPCR+RT+Master+Mix+with+gDNA+Remover/pm38000295-54-9-18
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
revertra acetm qpcr rt master mix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Zymo Research zr genomic dna tm tissue miniprep kit
Fig. 1. Bmal1 deficiency does not affect differentiation and morphology of BMMCs. (A) Representative dot-plot data (Left) and percentage of c-kit+FcεRIα+ cells (Right, n¼6) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks detected by flowcytometric analysis. (B) Flowcytometric analysis of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of c-kit (Left) or FceR1a levels (Right) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks (n = 6). (C-E) Representative pictures of toluidine blue (C), Diff-Quik (D) or esterase (E) staining of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence of 2- ME after 6–8 weeks. (F) Expression of mast cell differentiation marker and functional genes, determined by <t>qPCR</t> in WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME for 6–8 weeks (n = 3). Mean ± SD is shown. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, *P < 0.05. ns: non-specific difference. (For inter pretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Zr Genomic Dna Tm Tissue Miniprep Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/ZR+Genomic+DNA-Tissue+MiniPrep/pmc04003777-50-13-20
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zr genomic dna tm tissue miniprep kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega mouse genomic dna
Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of <t>genomic</t> <t>DNA</t> from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).
Mouse Genomic Dna, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/mouse+genomic+dna/pmc11177557-256-19-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse genomic dna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Valiant Co Ltd mouse fecal genomic dna extraction kit
Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of <t>genomic</t> <t>DNA</t> from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).
Mouse Fecal Genomic Dna Extraction Kit, supplied by Valiant Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/FastDNA+Spin+Kit/10__3390_slash_microorganisms14030701-44-1-15
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse fecal genomic dna extraction kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Vazyme Biotech Co hiscript ii q rt supermix for qpcr
Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of <t>genomic</t> <t>DNA</t> from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).
Hiscript Ii Q Rt Supermix For Qpcr, supplied by Vazyme Biotech Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/HiScript+IV+RT+SuperMix+for+qPCR+%2BgDNA+wiper/bio_rxiv__2024__08__30__610570-106-13-23
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hiscript ii q rt supermix for qpcr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Vazyme Biotech Co hiscript lll rt supermix for qpcr
Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of <t>genomic</t> <t>DNA</t> from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).
Hiscript Lll Rt Supermix For Qpcr, supplied by Vazyme Biotech Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/HiScript+III+RT+SuperMix+for+qPCR+%2BgDNA+wiper/pmc11464005-314-14-20
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hiscript lll rt supermix for qpcr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC communities
Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of <t>genomic</t> <t>DNA</t> from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).
Communities, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/Mycobiome+Genomic%3B+DNA+Mix/pmc10654091-246-14-15
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
communities - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Alomone Labs anti gdnf antibodies
( A ) Identification of candidate genes expressed in FAPs in response to glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor <t>(GDNF)</t> that may contribute to nerve regeneration. Number of genes that fit into each criterion is indicated. ( B ) Expression of Bdnf in each scRNA-seq sample shown on uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots. ( C ) Violin plot displaying the expression levels of Bdnf in the seven FAP clusters. ( D ) Scheme for sampling Schwann cells and FAPs at different time points post sciatic nerve <t>crush</t> <t>(SNC)</t> for gene expression analyses. ( E ) RT-qPCR results showing expression levels of Gdnf in Schwann cells (orange dot and line, left y-axis) and Bdnf in FAPs (blue dot and line, right y-axis) at different time points post-SNC. n=4, except for 0 and 2 dpi, where n=3. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, n.s., not significant. ( F ) Western blot results showing BDNF protein expression in PDGFRα + FAPs isolated from SNC-affected or uninjured contralateral muscles at 7 dpi. n=3. Mature form of BDNF is indicated with a red asterisk. Quantified values normalized to GAPDH is indicated below each protein. See for the experimental scheme. ( G ) Scheme for intramuscular injection of either PBS or recombinant mouse GDNF protein, with the time point for FAP isolation post-injection indicated. ( H ) RT-qPCR results show the expression level of Bdnf in FAPs 48 hr post intramuscular injection of either PBS (n=4) or GDNF (n=5). Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01. Figure 5—source data 1. The zip file contains raw western blot images, a marker image, and a marker-merged, labeled image obtained for .
Anti Gdnf Antibodies, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+gdna+samples/Anti-GDNF+Antibody/pmc11426970-276-26-28
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gdnf antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1. Bmal1 deficiency does not affect differentiation and morphology of BMMCs. (A) Representative dot-plot data (Left) and percentage of c-kit+FcεRIα+ cells (Right, n¼6) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks detected by flowcytometric analysis. (B) Flowcytometric analysis of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of c-kit (Left) or FceR1a levels (Right) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks (n = 6). (C-E) Representative pictures of toluidine blue (C), Diff-Quik (D) or esterase (E) staining of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence of 2- ME after 6–8 weeks. (F) Expression of mast cell differentiation marker and functional genes, determined by qPCR in WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME for 6–8 weeks (n = 3). Mean ± SD is shown. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, *P < 0.05. ns: non-specific difference. (For inter pretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Journal: Biochemical and biophysical research communications

Article Title: Deficiency of BMAL1 promotes ROS generation and enhances IgE-dependent degranulation in mast cells.

doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.149295

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Bmal1 deficiency does not affect differentiation and morphology of BMMCs. (A) Representative dot-plot data (Left) and percentage of c-kit+FcεRIα+ cells (Right, n¼6) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks detected by flowcytometric analysis. (B) Flowcytometric analysis of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of c-kit (Left) or FceR1a levels (Right) of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME after 6–8 weeks (n = 6). (C-E) Representative pictures of toluidine blue (C), Diff-Quik (D) or esterase (E) staining of WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence of 2- ME after 6–8 weeks. (F) Expression of mast cell differentiation marker and functional genes, determined by qPCR in WT or Bmal1-KO BMMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 2-ME for 6–8 weeks (n = 3). Mean ± SD is shown. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, *P < 0.05. ns: non-specific difference. (For inter pretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Article Snippet: The cDNA) was synthesized from RNA samples by the ReverTra AceTM qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA remover (TOYOBO, Japan).

Techniques: Cell Culture, Fluorescence, Diff-Quik, Staining, Expressing, Cell Differentiation, Marker, Functional Assay

Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of genomic DNA from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).

Journal: NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Article Title: Comparative analysis and classification of highly divergent mouse rDNA units based on their intergenic spacer (IGS) variability

doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqae070

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of mouse rDNA isolation. (A) Step 1: Isolation of genomic DNA from the 4T1 cells. (B) Scheme of the mouse rDNA repeat. The rDNA repeat is composed of the ∼13 kb transcribed region encoding 45S rRNA (5′ ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and 3′ ETS) and a ∼22 to 32 kb intergenic spacer (IGS). The pJY-mrDNA TAR vector contains 5′-84 bp and 3′-78 bp targeting hooks derived from the mouse 18S rDNA sequence. To clone the mouse rDNA repeat, TAR vector containing 5′ hook (red) and 3′ hook (blue) is linearized to expose targeting sequences. (C) TAR cloning of the rDNA repeats. Homologous recombination between the 5′ and 3′ targeting hook sequences and the homologous targeted sequences in the rDNA repeat leads to rescue of mouse rDNA repeats as circular YAC/BAC molecules in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (D) Southern blot analysis of rDNA in mouse 4T1 and MEFs cell lines. After I-PpoI digestion of DNA isolated from each cell line, rDNA repeats were detected with a probe specific to 28S. As a positive control, I-PpoI-digested DNA isolated from the human RPE1 cell line was used. (E) A copy number of the rDNA repeats was estimated by qPCR with a set of the 45S primers specific to 18S and 28S (Supplementary Table S1).

Article Snippet: Based on qPCR, 4T1 and MEFs cell lines contain 173 and 169 rDNA units, respectively, while a third sample, Promega mouse genomic DNA, contains 473 units (Figure ).

Techniques: Isolation, Plasmid Preparation, Derivative Assay, Sequencing, Cloning, Homologous Recombination, Southern Blot, Positive Control

( A ) Identification of candidate genes expressed in FAPs in response to glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) that may contribute to nerve regeneration. Number of genes that fit into each criterion is indicated. ( B ) Expression of Bdnf in each scRNA-seq sample shown on uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots. ( C ) Violin plot displaying the expression levels of Bdnf in the seven FAP clusters. ( D ) Scheme for sampling Schwann cells and FAPs at different time points post sciatic nerve crush (SNC) for gene expression analyses. ( E ) RT-qPCR results showing expression levels of Gdnf in Schwann cells (orange dot and line, left y-axis) and Bdnf in FAPs (blue dot and line, right y-axis) at different time points post-SNC. n=4, except for 0 and 2 dpi, where n=3. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, n.s., not significant. ( F ) Western blot results showing BDNF protein expression in PDGFRα + FAPs isolated from SNC-affected or uninjured contralateral muscles at 7 dpi. n=3. Mature form of BDNF is indicated with a red asterisk. Quantified values normalized to GAPDH is indicated below each protein. See for the experimental scheme. ( G ) Scheme for intramuscular injection of either PBS or recombinant mouse GDNF protein, with the time point for FAP isolation post-injection indicated. ( H ) RT-qPCR results show the expression level of Bdnf in FAPs 48 hr post intramuscular injection of either PBS (n=4) or GDNF (n=5). Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01. Figure 5—source data 1. The zip file contains raw western blot images, a marker image, and a marker-merged, labeled image obtained for .

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors sense and repair peripheral nerve injury via the GDNF-BDNF axis

doi: 10.7554/eLife.97662

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Identification of candidate genes expressed in FAPs in response to glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) that may contribute to nerve regeneration. Number of genes that fit into each criterion is indicated. ( B ) Expression of Bdnf in each scRNA-seq sample shown on uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots. ( C ) Violin plot displaying the expression levels of Bdnf in the seven FAP clusters. ( D ) Scheme for sampling Schwann cells and FAPs at different time points post sciatic nerve crush (SNC) for gene expression analyses. ( E ) RT-qPCR results showing expression levels of Gdnf in Schwann cells (orange dot and line, left y-axis) and Bdnf in FAPs (blue dot and line, right y-axis) at different time points post-SNC. n=4, except for 0 and 2 dpi, where n=3. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, n.s., not significant. ( F ) Western blot results showing BDNF protein expression in PDGFRα + FAPs isolated from SNC-affected or uninjured contralateral muscles at 7 dpi. n=3. Mature form of BDNF is indicated with a red asterisk. Quantified values normalized to GAPDH is indicated below each protein. See for the experimental scheme. ( G ) Scheme for intramuscular injection of either PBS or recombinant mouse GDNF protein, with the time point for FAP isolation post-injection indicated. ( H ) RT-qPCR results show the expression level of Bdnf in FAPs 48 hr post intramuscular injection of either PBS (n=4) or GDNF (n=5). Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01. Figure 5—source data 1. The zip file contains raw western blot images, a marker image, and a marker-merged, labeled image obtained for .

Article Snippet: Tibialis anterior muscle and the two gastrocnemius muscles (GA, lateral, and medial) were each injected with 10 μg of either normal rabbit IgG (Sino Biological) or anti-GDNF antibodies (Alomone Labs) using 31-gauge insulin syringes 24 hr post-SNC.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Expressing, Sampling, Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Isolation, Muscles, Injection, Recombinant, Marker, Labeling

( A ) Experimental scheme depicting intramuscular injection of either anti-GDNF antibodies or IgG control after sciatic nerve crush (SNC), along with the experimental timeline. ( B ) RT-qPCR results show the expression levels of Bdnf in nerve injury-exposed FAPs affected by intramuscular injection of either IgG control or anti-GDNF antibodies. n=4. Unpaired t-test.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors sense and repair peripheral nerve injury via the GDNF-BDNF axis

doi: 10.7554/eLife.97662

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental scheme depicting intramuscular injection of either anti-GDNF antibodies or IgG control after sciatic nerve crush (SNC), along with the experimental timeline. ( B ) RT-qPCR results show the expression levels of Bdnf in nerve injury-exposed FAPs affected by intramuscular injection of either IgG control or anti-GDNF antibodies. n=4. Unpaired t-test.

Article Snippet: Tibialis anterior muscle and the two gastrocnemius muscles (GA, lateral, and medial) were each injected with 10 μg of either normal rabbit IgG (Sino Biological) or anti-GDNF antibodies (Alomone Labs) using 31-gauge insulin syringes 24 hr post-SNC.

Techniques: Injection, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors sense and repair peripheral nerve injury via the GDNF-BDNF axis

doi: 10.7554/eLife.97662

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Tibialis anterior muscle and the two gastrocnemius muscles (GA, lateral, and medial) were each injected with 10 μg of either normal rabbit IgG (Sino Biological) or anti-GDNF antibodies (Alomone Labs) using 31-gauge insulin syringes 24 hr post-SNC.

Techniques: Injection, Electron Microscopy, Recombinant, Software, Isolation, Light Microscopy, Imaging